Legal Opinion
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 22, 2007No. 1 CA-MH 06-0013PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
154 P.3d 387 (2007)
IN RE MH XXXX-XXXXXX.
No. 1 CA-MH 06-0013.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.
March 22, 2007.
Andrew P. Thomas, Maricopa County Attorney by Geraldine Roll, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.
James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender by Tennie B. Martin, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 We address the legislative requirement for physician "opinions" in involuntary mental health proceedings under Arizona Revised Statutes ("A.R.S.") section 36-539(B) (2003). We hold that a physician's…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Federoff v. Pioneer Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008