Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1953No. 7793PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This case concerns an alleged oral promise to make a will. Lillian Jackson, plaintiff, claims that at the time she entered into a written property settlement agreement with and divorced John Jackson in 1919, he promised to bequeath $3,500 to each of their seven children. When he died in 1949, his will did not so provide. She sues his estate in behalf of the children to enforce this oral contract. The trial court resolved the issues against her. Her appeal is based mainly upon rulings excluding her proffered evidence, a discussion of which requires a factual background.

Apparen…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. De Mattos v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Durbin v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Howdershell v. HowdershellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Baker v. BouchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. SchollUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Martin v. SchollUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Martin v. SchollUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API