Legal Opinion

Martin v. Scholl

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1983No. 17542Published

1Opinion of the Court

678 P.2d 274 (1983)

Rodney MARTIN, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Bernice SCHOLL, Executrix of George H. Chaffin Estate, and George H. Chaffin Investment Company, a Utah limited partnership, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 17542.

Supreme Court of Utah.

November 14, 1983.

Arthur H. Nielsen, Clark R. Nielsen, John D. Russell, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.

Gordon L. Roberts, Raymond J. Etcheverry, Kent O. Roche, Salt Lake City, Dave McMullin, Payson, for plaintiff and respondent.

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant George H. Chaffin Investment Company, a limited partnership, seeks reversal of a decree…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Price v. LloydUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Brinton ex rel. Pavey v. Van CottUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  4. McBride v. McBrideUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API