Legal Opinion

Martin v. Scholl

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1983No. 17542PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant George H. Chaffin Investment Company, a limited partnership, seeks reversal of a decree granting plaintiff Rodney Martin specific performance of an oral contract which the trial court found that the deceased George H. Chaffin had made to convey or devise to him certain real property in Genola, Utah County.

Martin began working as a ranch laborer for Chaffin in 1936. He became foreman over all of Chaffin’s farm and ranch properties in 1947 and continued in that capacity beyond Chaffin’s death to January of 1976. The Investment Company disputed but the trial court found…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Price v. LloydUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Brinton ex rel. Pavey v. Van CottUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ravarino v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Randall v. Tracy Collins Trust CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Holmgren Brothers, Inc. v. BallardUtah Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Spears v. WarrUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jenkins v. PercivalUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. PartnershipArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. MediaNews Group, Inc. v. McCartheyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API