Hillman v. Griffin
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Sacramento County. Action by A. C. Hillman against C. W. Griffin. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This action is in the nature of replevin. The plaintiff claims the property through purchase from Mrs. Emma H. Briggs, owner of the Glorietta Vineyard ranch in Yolo county. It consists of a large quantity of boxes and trays used on a fruit ranch, together with the tools and implements of various kinds necessary for the cultivation of such ranch, all embraced in the bill of sale dated the 12th of January, 1895, for the consideration, as stated by the plaintiff, of $6,000; also two mules and one mare, of the value of $500, not embraced in said bill of sale but purchased by the plaintiff from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scrivener v. DietzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Harvey v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Fridenberg v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Shea v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchell v. Ada Investment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926