Legal Opinion

Shea v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1894No. 18232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, J.—

A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiffs electing not to amend, judgment was entered for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

It was averred in the complaint that defendant Johnson brought an action against defendant Zetz to recover money alleged to be due from the latter to the former, and in said action caused certain described personal property of Zetz to be attached; and that afterwards plaintiffs brought an action against said Zetz and caused the same property to be attached. The purpose of the present action is to have it decreed that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scrivener v. DietzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Harvey v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Fridenberg v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cuebas v. Banco Territorial y AgrícolaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  3. Hillman v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cuebas v. Banco Territorial y AgrícolaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API