Wolfskill v. Malajowich
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventeenth District, Los Angeles County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Crockett. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment of nonsuit in an action to recover the possession of land. The *279plaintiffs claim under conveyances from one Fraijo,- who, in September, 1865, filed a proper affidavit, in accordance with what is known as the Possessory Act of this State (Statutes 1852, p. 158) and the Acts amendatory thereof. The proof shows that immediately after filing the affidavit, Fraijo erected improvements on the place, of the value of $400, cultivated a portion of it, and actually resided on it until September, 1866,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Ayres v. BensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Gird v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by9 opinions
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Wilson v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Rivers v. BurbankNevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Eureka Mining & Smelting Co. v. WayNevada Supreme Court · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.