Whitworth v. Sour
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
Complaint on a promissory note alleged to ¡have been made by John L. McCorkle, William B. Whit-worth and Benjamin Benbow, by the name and style of McCorkle & Co.
Whitworth and Benbow answered:
First. The general denial; and,
Second. That on the 29th day of April, 1874, the plaintiff in this action brought suit before a justice of the peace on the identical note sued on in this suit, and against these identical defendants, demanding judgment for two hundred dollars thereon; that all of these defendants, except John L. McCorkle, who was not served with process, appeared to said action, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harrison v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Earl v. DresserIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- McElfatrick v. CoffrothIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Roloson v. HerrIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- New Albany & Salem Railroad v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kirby v. BowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Hoffman v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Sellers v. SellersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Robinson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- State v. FriedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898