New Albany & Salem Railroad v. Wilson
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
Wilson sued the company for services as engineer, and for disbursing moneys of the defendant. The defendant answered: 1. Denial. 2. To the jurisdiction. 3. Payment. 4. Set-off. 5. That plaintiff was employed at $1,000 per annum, for a time, &c.; that his salary was then increased to $1,500, in consideration that he should perform all other and additional duties to his said regular engagement as chief engineer; which was accepted by the plaintiff in full satisfaction for all his services in any respect whatever, and that the same had been paid. 6. Set-off and counter claim. Reply:’ in denial…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Simonton v. Huntington & Liberty Mills Plankroad Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Roloson v. HerrIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirby v. BowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Robinson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Whitworth v. SourIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Sherman v. CrothersIndiana Supreme Court · 1865