Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Price

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Isaac C. Price sued Thomas J. Harrison to recover dámages for criminal conversation had between said Harrison and the wife of said Price; and he recovered 900 dollars. A demurrer was sustained to a paragraph of the defendant’s answer, setting up want of virtue in Price and wife. That paragraph purported to go in bar of the action. It contained no matter in bar; at most, but matter in mitigation of damages. Such matter is not pleadable at all, so' far as we are .aware, in an action for criminal conversation, and is not necessarily pleaded in any action, in order to its being given in evidence.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Ball v. CarleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Long v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Stamets v. MitchenorIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Carter v. Ford Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Pitzer v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Achey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API