Legal Opinion

Berry v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 7, 1952No. 49288PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

This action is brought by a retired Commander in the United States Naval Reserve to recover (1) the active-duty pay and allowances allegedly due him for the period September 1, 1946, through October 19, 1946, and (2) the difference between the retired pay actually received by him since February 1, 1947, computed on the basis of 6214 per centum of his active-duty pay at the time of his retirement pursuant to the provisions of the Act of February 21, 1946, ch. 34, §§ 6, 7, 60 Stat. 27, 34 U. S. C. §§ 410 (b) and (c), and retired pay computed on the basis of 75 per centum of active-duty pay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Danielson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Van Zante v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Egan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Egan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Perry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
  4. Tracy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. William O. Perry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API