Legal Opinion

Firth v. Lu

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 6, 2000No. 45247-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Becker, A.C.J.

—Although the purchaser of a cooperative apartment unit receives shares of stock rather than a deed, the interest transferred is an interest in real property because the shares of stock do not have the attributes of true securities and are necessarily accompanied by a proprietary lease. A contract to purchase real property must contain a legal description of the property to comply with the statute of frauds. In the present case, the contract to purchase a cooperative unit lacked a legal description, and is therefore unenforceable. We reverse and remand for an *269order dismissing…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aventa Learning, Inc. v. K12, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  2. Firth v. Hefu LuWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Firth v. LuWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Firth v. LuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Firth v. Hefu LuWashington Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API