Legal Opinion
Firth v. Lu
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 6, 2000No. 45247-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 P.3d 618 (2000)
103 Wash.App. 267
Donald R. FIRTH and Barbara A. Palecek, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
Hefu LU and Qian Sun, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 45247-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
November 6, 2000.
Howard Goodfriend, Edwards, Sieh, Smith & Goodfriend, P.S., Kenton Longley, Seattle, for Appellants.
Jeffery Eustis, Law Offices of J. Richard Aramburu, Seattle, for Respondents.
BECKER, A.C.J.
Although the purchaser of a cooperative apartment unit receives shares of stock rather than a deed, the interest transferred is an interest in real property because the shares…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aventa Learning, Inc. v. K12, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- Firth v. Hefu LuWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Firth v. LuWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Bourgo v. Canby School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Firth v. Hefu LuWashington Supreme Court · 2002