Legal Opinion

Mock v. Terry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiff is in the business of selling campers. The defendant negligently operated her automobile, damaging four of plaintiff’s campers. Plaintiff’s action for damages was tried to the court without a jury. The only issue at trial and on appeal is the measure of damages. The trial court fixed the plaintiff’s damage' as the retail selling price of the campers before the damage was inflicted, less salvage value. The defendant contends that the proper measure is wholesale price f.o.b. plaintiff’s place of business, less salvage value.

Oregon has followed the general rule in property damage cases…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Longbotham v. TakeokaOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sears v. LydonIdaho Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. J & H Auto Trim Co., Inc. v. Bellefonte Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Jacqueline's Washington, Inc. v. Mercantile Stores Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. ERA Helicopters, Inc. v. Digicon Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. IslamOregon Supreme Court · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API