Legal Opinion

Longbotham v. Takeoka

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This action was originally commenced by the plaintiff against S. Kajikawa and T. Sumida as defendants. The first-named defendant died pendente lite and D. Takeoka as his administrator was made defendant in his stead.

The defendants are the owners in fee of a three-story brick building covering a half block in the City of Portland. The rooms on the first floor are used as stores. Those above are used and occupied by the defendants as a hotel. The plaintiff was a tenant of one of the storerooms from month to month, paying rent to the defendants. For the purpose of giving light and ventilation to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Dollard v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Doupe v. . GeninNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Lee Tung v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Priest v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. CC Anderson Stores Co. v. Boise Water CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Garrett v. Eugene Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952
  5. Germansen v. EganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API