Legal Opinion

Maday v. Grathwohl

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 2011No. A11-721PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Appellant land owner challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his breach-of-contract claim against respondent farmers, contending that the district court erred in determining that evidence related to a prior oral agreement between the parties was inadmissible under the parol evidence rule. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondents Tim Grathwohl, Jason Grathwohl, and Randy Grathwohl are brothers who together own and operate respondent-partnership Grathwohl Brothers LLP. Respondents own and manage hog barns to raise hogs for other entities. In 2001,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Qwinstar Corporation v. Curtis AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. P Park Management, LLC v. Paisley Park Facility, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  3. Reach Companies, LLC v. Newsert LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API