Norton v. Coffield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentWelch, Justice
In my view this decision does not properly follow or deal with the precedent of our former decisions, and therefore, this may add confusion to the question of what is the law in Oklahoma as applied to such a difficult situation.
The reason for dissenting is that, as I view it, we have several times heretofore held to the contrary as a matter of law, and those former decisions have not been over*441ruled, and, though not followed, are not •overruled here; so that until this decision, I thought we had come to the view and legal philosophy in this state, and so announced in our decisions, that when a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Brokeshoulder v. BrokeshoulderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Holloway v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Haile v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.