Legal Opinion

Holloway v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1913No. 3261PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John C amt hers, Judge. Action by Joe McCormick against Robert Holloway, a minor, and another for partition of land. From the judgment defendant Holloway brings error, and plaintiff files a cross-petition in error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action in partition, commenced by Joe McCormick in the district court of Okfuskee county, against Robert Holloway, a minor, claiming that plaintiff and defendant were each the owners of an undivided one-half interest in an allotment of land located in said county, which had been allotted to Lucinda McCormick, a freed woman, who died in said county, intestate, on August 5, 1909, and praying for a partition of the land between said owners. The defendant answered by his guardian, admitting that he was a minor under nineteen, years of age, and also that Lucinda…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. McAllister v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Estate of Kuhn v. KuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. In re the Estate of GorkowWashington Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Eversole v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Smith v. GreenburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. In Re Tyler's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re Wray's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API