Legal Opinion
Jezewski v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1926No. 4497-4499, 4501, 4503-4511, 4517, 4523, 4530, 4554-4556PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is insisted on behalf of the plaintiffs in error that the verdict and judgment arc not sustained by the evidence. The record does not present this question, at least, in so far as a large number of these plaintiffs in error are concerned. Motions for directed verdicts were rnado at the close of the government’s case. These motions were not renewed at the close of all the evidence, and by proceeding with the introduction of evidence in their own behalf the defendants waived the error, if any, in overruling them. Cohen v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 488, 491.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Davidson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Edward Lester WenzelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Beland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.