Legal Opinion

Cohen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1923No. 3737PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Cohen was convicted of violating section 39 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10203) by offering and giving a bribe to one Flora, a prohibition agent, to induce him not to prosecute Cohen for having violated the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.). The reversal is sought for three reasons: (1) The indictment did not allege that the bribe was given with regard to a matter pending before the prohibition agent; (2) the indictment did not allege that Cohen knew that Flora was a prohibition agent; (3) the case was one of entrapment.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Browne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Zucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  4. Rembrandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. Blake v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Herman Krogmann and Emil Klauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  3. Malatkofski v. United States. Seigel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  4. Hopper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  5. Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API