Coble Wall Trust Co., Inc. v. Palmer
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTTS, Justice.
The supreme court ruled that the probate court had jurisdiction of this lawsuit which was based on alleged consumer law violation and common law negligence of the guardian/temporary administrator. 1 Jurisdiction being the only issue dealt with by the supreme court, the case was remanded for disposition of the remaining points of error. See Coble Wall Trust Co. v. Palmer, 848 S.W.2d 696 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1991), rev’d, Palmer v. Coble Wall Trust Co., 851 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.1992). We reconsider and revise our earlier decision regarding some points of error.
The San Antonio…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Texas Water Rights Commission v. Crow Iron WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Abbott Laboratories v. GravisTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Palmer v. Coble Wall Trust Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Byrd v. Woodruff, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elwood CLUCK, Also Known as Jack Cluck, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Texas State Bank v. AmaroTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Cherry v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.