Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Coppock

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 9, 2013No. Misc. Docket AG No. 66PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

Most lawyers prize their integrity. The Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Responsibility (“MLRPC”) enforce that ideal by requiring truthfulness in statements to others during the course of representation1 and candor toward tribunals2 and by prohibiting dishonest conduct.3 Human frailty being *632what it is, not all lawyers tell the truth all the time. It falls to this Court in its capacity as the principal regulator of the legal profession in Maryland to distinguish those untruths that violate the MLRPC from those that do not. For example, this Court has held that a lawyer who lies to his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API