Legal Opinion

United States v. Aurandt

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1910No. 1254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the First Judicial District Court before John R. McFie, Associate Justice. In prosecution under 5 Fed. Stats. Ann., sec. 5467, p. 959, the indictment should describe the valuable content of the packet according to its nature under one of the appropriate classifications in the Statute.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the First Judicial District Court before John R. McFie, Associate Justice. In prosecution under 5 Fed. Stats. Ann., sec. 5467, p. 959, the indictment should describe the valuable content of the packet according to its nature under one of the appropriate classifications in the Statute. Roáencrans v. United States, 165 U. S. 257; United States v. Eliason, 18 D. C. 104; United States v. Clark, Crabbe 584; United States v. Patterson, 6 McLean 466; Jones v. United States, 27 Fed. 447; U. S. v. Keen, 1 McLean 439; U. S. v. Lancaster, 2 McLean 435; Jones v. U. S., 27 Fed. 447. ■ The…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

POPE, J.

On March 10, 1906, Aurandt, the appellant was indicted for embezzling a letter containing an article of value, in violation of U. S. R. S. 5467. He was found guilty on March 11, 1908, and after motions for new trial and in .arrest was sentenced to imprisonment in the territorial penitentiary for one year. He thereupon appealed to this court.

1 The first ground of error proceeds upon the following statement of facts. During the cross examination of the first witness for the government it was discovered that the defendant had never been arraigned. Thereupon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Parkinson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  5. Dill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BrusenhanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. State v. ParkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. RhodesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Williams v. McAdooNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API