Legal Opinion

Lanier v. South Carolina

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 4, 1985No. 85-5260PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

Petitioner was convicted of armed robbery. He contends that his confession should have been suppressed because it was the product of an illegal arrest. The South Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s rejection of his motion to suppress the confession:

“Assuming, without deciding, that Lanier’s arrest was illegal, we nevertheless hold his confession was admissible. A confession made while the accused is in custody before any warrant for his arrest has been issued is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Taylor v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. FunchessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Abram v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. LekasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States v. Jose MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API