Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1988No. CR 87-22PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The appellant was charged with capital felony murder pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1501(l)(a)(c) (presently codified as Ark. Code Ann. § 5-10-101 (Supp. 1987)), and after a jury trial was sentenced to life without parole. For reversal he argues three points: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress his custodial confession; (2) that the court erred in allowing the testimony of a witness by telephone; and (3) that the court erred in refusing to grant a continuance. Finding prejudicial error in allowing the confession to be introduced into evidence, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Friend v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Addison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Barry v. LindnerNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Burnett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API