Taylor v. Alabama
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
This case presents the narrow question whether petitioner’s confession should have been suppressed as the fruit of an illegal arrest. The Supreme Court of Alabama held that the evidence was properly admitted. Because the decision below is inconsistent with our decisions in Dunaway v. New York, 442 U. S. 200 (1979), and Brown v. Illinois, 422 U. S. 590 (1975), we reverse.
I
In 1978, a grocery store in Montgomery, Ala., was robbed. There had been a number of robberies in this area, and the police had initiated an intensive manhunt in an effort to apprehend the robbers. An individual who was at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by600 opinions
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Kaupp v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
595 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.