Legal Opinion

Everest Exploration, Inc. v. URI, INC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 14, 2004No. 04-03-00341-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.

Everest Exploration, Inc. appeals the summary judgment declaring that uranium leases held by its competitor, URI, Inc., were extended by payment of shut-in royalties and awarding URI its attorney’s fees. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

URI, Inc. and Everest Exploration, Inc. claim competing rights to the uranium underlying certain property owned by the Vasquez family. URI bases its claim on four uranium mining leases and a ratification agreement by which the Vasquez family conveyed to URI the right to mine the uranium until February 12,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  2. Hourani v. Katzen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. In Re Lesikar, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Hachar v. Hachar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  5. In re LesikarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API