Legal Opinion

In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litig.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided April 5, 2018No. Master File No.: 2:13–CV–20000–RDP; MDL NO.: 2406PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. Introduction

As the Supreme Court has observed, "the 'central evil addressed by Sherman Act § 1' is the 'elimin[ation of] competition that would otherwise exist.' " Am. Needle, Inc. v. Nat'l Football League , 560 U.S. 183, 195, 130 S.Ct. 2201, 176 L.Ed.2d 947 (2010) (quoting Areeda & Hovenkamp ¶ 1462b, at 193-194).

Currently before the court are (1) the parties' respective motions for partial summary judgment on the standard of review applicable to Plaintiffs' claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (Docs. # 1348, 1350, 1353),…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  2. Dignity Health v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. GATES v. DEMATIC CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  4. In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
  5. In Re: Delta Dental Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API