In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litig.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. Introduction
As the Supreme Court has observed, "the 'central evil addressed by Sherman Act § 1' is the 'elimin[ation of] competition that would otherwise exist.' " Am. Needle, Inc. v. Nat'l Football League , 560 U.S. 183, 195, 130 S.Ct. 2201, 176 L.Ed.2d 947 (2010) (quoting Areeda & Hovenkamp ¶ 1462b, at 193-194).
Currently before the court are (1) the parties' respective motions for partial summary judgment on the standard of review applicable to Plaintiffs' claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (Docs. # 1348, 1350, 1353),…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Dignity Health v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- GATES v. DEMATIC CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
- In Re: Delta Dental Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020