Legal Opinion

People v. Cullen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

We affirm. To the extent that defendant contends that Ms waiver of the right to appeal was invalid, we are unpersuaded. The plea allocution — which included an oral waiver — and the written waiver demonstrate that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal the conviction and sentence (see People v Jerome, 98 AD3d 1188, 1189 [2012]; see also People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Ducheneaux, 97 AD3d 852, 853 [2012]). Consequently, we are precluded from considering his claim that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 91…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. JeromeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. DucheneauxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. FallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API