People v. Cullen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
We affirm. To the extent that defendant contends that Ms waiver of the right to appeal was invalid, we are unpersuaded. The plea allocution — which included an oral waiver — and the written waiver demonstrate that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal the conviction and sentence (see People v Jerome, 98 AD3d 1188, 1189 [2012]; see also People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Ducheneaux, 97 AD3d 852, 853 [2012]). Consequently, we are precluded from considering his claim that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 91…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JeromeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DucheneauxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. FallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. FallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013