Legal Opinion

Gilchrist v. Perl

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1985No. C8-84-2152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

NATURE OF THE ACTION

Petitioner seeks discretionary review of a November 15, 1984 order which denied her motion for partial summary judgment. Respondents join in the petition. Believing the trial court should have ordered partial summary judgment in favor of petitioner, we extend discretionary review and certify the matter to the Minnesota Supreme Court.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Petitioner retained respondents to prosecute her “Daikon Shield” claim. Respondents obtained a settlement of $85,000, $28,333.33 of which was paid to respondents as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Merriman v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Gaspord v. Washington County Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API