Gilchrist v. Perl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
Petitioner seeks discretionary review of a November 15, 1984 order which denied her motion for partial summary judgment. Respondents join in the petition. Believing the trial court should have ordered partial summary judgment in favor of petitioner, we extend discretionary review and certify the matter to the Minnesota Supreme Court.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Petitioner retained respondents to prosecute her “Daikon Shield” claim. Respondents obtained a settlement of $85,000, $28,333.33 of which was paid to respondents as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Merriman v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Gaspord v. Washington County Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985