Legal Opinion

Gilchrist v. Perl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 3, 1985No. C8-84-2152Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the certification from the Court of Appeals, 363 N.W.2d 904, be, and the same is, approved; that the petition for further review filed on behalf of the petitioners Norman Perl, et al., be, and the same is, granted; and that the application of Marshall Tanick to serve and file a brief as amicus curiae be, and the same is, granted. The following briefing schedule is established: the brief of the petitioners and the amicus curiae shall be served and filed not later than 30 days from the date of this order;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gilchrist v. PerlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API