Legal Opinion

Lange v. Fisher

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1983No. Civ. 6263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Defendant appeals from an order striking his cost bill after judgment.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1033 provides in pertinent part as follows: “In superior courts, . . . the party in whose favor the judgment is ordered, and who claims his costs, must serve upon the adverse party, and file at any time after the verdict or decision of the court, and not later than ten days after the entry of the judgment, a memorandum of the items of his costs and necessary disbursements in the action or proceeding . . . .” (Underlining added.) Here, after a trial without a jury and after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Williamson v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Combs v. EberhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Glass v. BenkertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. California Recreation Industries v. KiersteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. PAMELA W. v. MillsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API