State v. Reed
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The State convicted Jimmy Reed of unlawful possession of a firearm. On appeal, Reed argues that the unlawful possession statute requires the State to prove that he knew his firearm possession was illegal and that he knew of his prior disqualifying felony. He also contends that the statute violates the state and federal constitutions’ equal protection clauses because defendants convicted after 1994 must be notified that their possession of a firearm is unlawful, while defendants convicted before 1994 are not so informed. Because the unlawful possession statute does not require knowledge that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Shawn P.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Edward T. Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- State v. SwindellWashington Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SemakulaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. KrzeszowskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.