Legal Opinion
Hall v. State, 2008-T-0073 (1-30-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2009No. 2008-T-0073PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM OPINION
{¶ 1} This action in mandamus is presently before this court for final disposition of the motion to dismiss of respondent, the state of Ohio. As the primary grounds for its motion, respondent asserts that the petition of relator, Don Hall, fails to set forth a viable claim for relief because his own allegations demonstrate that he has not satisfied certain statutory requirements governing an inmate's request for copies of public records. For the following reasons, we conclude that the motion to dismiss is well taken.
{¶ 2} Relator is currently a prisoner in the Marion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Russell v. ThorntonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Warren v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. May v. Lake Cty. Prosecutor, 2006-L-251 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AskewOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Dillingham v. Butler Cty. Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Court of Claims · 2018
- State v. ChristianOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Townsend v. Cuyahoga Cty. Pros.Ohio Court of Claims · 2019
- Townsend v. Cuyahoga Cty. Pros.Ohio Court of Claims · 2019