Legal Opinion
Morgan v. City of Los Angeles Board of Pension Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 2000No. B141831PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
Appellants, current and retired Los Angeles Police Department officers, seek inclusion of certain uniform field assignment incentive pay (Incentive Pay) in the base upon which their pensions are calculated. This Incentive Pay was created by a memorandum of understanding (MOU) negotiated between the Police Protective League (representing appellants) and the City of Los Angeles, and expressly provides that it is not to be pension-based. Appellants contend that the Incentive Pay is “Special Pay” and/or “Assignment Pay” as defined in the Los Angeles City Charter, and consequently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Ben-Zvi v. Edmar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Brisbane Lodging, L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- R.W.L. Enters. v. Oldcastle, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.