Legal Opinion

Picha v. Central Metropolitan Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1925No. 24,212PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 201 N.W. 315, 203 N.W. 617. Defendant is a banking corporation, organized under the laws of Minnesota, and is doing a general banking business at Saint Paul, Minnesota. The plaintiff and William Picha are husband and wife. At the time of the commencement of this action, the husband brought a similar action against the defendant. The two causes were tried below as one action and submitted on the same record. Certain issues were submitted to a jury, and the court made findings and ordered judgment against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff in each case. From an order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Banque Franco-Egyptienne v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  3. Picha v. Central Metropolitan BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Eberlein v. Stockyards Mortgage & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Greene v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Engen v. Merchants & Manufacturers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Klemme v. LongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API