Baker v. Criterion Insurance
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Ruth Baker was injured when riding as a passenger in her own vehicle. The driver was a permissive user who had no insurance policy of his own. He was insured under Baker’s policy with Criterion Insurance Company (Criterion). Criterion paid Baker $15,000, which was the limit of the bodily injury coverage in her policy.
Baker brought suit to recover additional compensation under the $15,000 of uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) coverage in her policy. The court below granted Criterion’s motion for summary judgment and this appeal followed. We agree that Baker may not recover from…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. WarneyNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Peterson v. Colonial Ins. Co. of CaliforniaNevada Supreme Court · 1984
4Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. YoungNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Delgado v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Estate LoMastro Ex Rel. LoMastro v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Hartz v. MitchellNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Federated American Insurance v. GranilloNevada Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.