Legal Opinion

Baker v. Criterion Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1991No. 20476PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Ruth Baker was injured when riding as a passenger in her own vehicle. The driver was a permissive user who had no insurance policy of his own. He was insured under Baker’s policy with Criterion Insurance Company (Criterion). Criterion paid Baker $15,000, which was the limit of the bodily injury coverage in her policy.

Baker brought suit to recover additional compensation under the $15,000 of uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) coverage in her policy. The court below granted Criterion’s motion for summary judgment and this appeal followed. We agree that Baker may not recover from…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. WarneyNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Peterson v. Colonial Ins. Co. of CaliforniaNevada Supreme Court · 1984

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. YoungNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Delgado v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Estate LoMastro Ex Rel. LoMastro v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hartz v. MitchellNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Federated American Insurance v. GranilloNevada Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API