Legal Opinion

Federated American Insurance v. Granillo

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1992No. 22643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Springer, J.:

Respondent Bernardo Granillo, Sr. (“Granillo”) was insured by appellant Federated American Insurance Company (“Federated”). Federated offered to insure Granillo at a lower rate if his son, respondent Bernardo Granillo, Jr. (“Bernardo”), was excluded from coverage. Specifically, Granillo was told that his policy would cost $552.00 per annum with Bernardo excluded or $1,170.00 per annum if Bernardo were covered. Although Granillo accepted the lower premium, he nonetheless allowed Bernardo to drive; subsequently, Bernardo caused an accident in which another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Baker v. Criterion InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hartz v. MitchellNevada Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lincoln General Insurance v. Progressive Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. National Casualty Company v. SoteloDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  3. TORRES VS. NEV. DIRECT INSURANCE CO. C/W 61640Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  4. TORRES VS. NEV. DIRECT INSURANCE CO. C/W 61640Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. TORRES VS. NEV. DIRECT INSURANCE CO. C/W 61640Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API