Federated American Insurance v. Granillo
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Springer, J.:
Respondent Bernardo Granillo, Sr. (“Granillo”) was insured by appellant Federated American Insurance Company (“Federated”). Federated offered to insure Granillo at a lower rate if his son, respondent Bernardo Granillo, Jr. (“Bernardo”), was excluded from coverage. Specifically, Granillo was told that his policy would cost $552.00 per annum with Bernardo excluded or $1,170.00 per annum if Bernardo were covered. Although Granillo accepted the lower premium, he nonetheless allowed Bernardo to drive; subsequently, Bernardo caused an accident in which another…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Baker v. Criterion InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Hartz v. MitchellNevada Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lincoln General Insurance v. Progressive Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- National Casualty Company v. SoteloDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- TORRES VS. NEV. DIRECT INSURANCE CO. C/W 61640Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
- TORRES VS. NEV. DIRECT INSURANCE CO. C/W 61640Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
- TORRES VS. NEV. DIRECT INSURANCE CO. C/W 61640Nevada Supreme Court · 2015