Legal Opinion
State v. Fitterer
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 2002No. 20020076PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Larry Fitterer appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his motion to suppress and the subsequent judgment based on a jury’s verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. We reverse and remand with instructions.
I
[¶ 2] On September 14, 2001, the North Dakota Highway Patrol stopped’ Larry Fitterer at a sobriety checkpoint and charged him with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Before trial, Fitterer moved to suppress evidence as a result of the checkpoint. Fitterer claimed he was not stopped for committing a traffic…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Jamestown v. JeromeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Grand Forks v. RamstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. LeherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CanfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Grand Forks v. RamstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.