Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1999No. S063512PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case, we consider the specificity required in a motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5 (section 1538.5). We conclude that a defendant must state the grounds for the motion with sufficient particularity to give notice to the prosecution of the sort of evidence it will need to present in response. In this case, we find that defendant’s moving papers were sufficient to provide this notice to the prosecution, and that he did not narrow the scope of his motion at the hearing. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Factual and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. People v. ReddCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. FayedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. Silveria and TravisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API