Legal Opinion

Charles Lewis v. Freddie Smith, Mark Smith and Arnold Holt

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 19, 1988No. 87-7575PublishedCited by 307 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

In this case, we affirm the district court’s $500 damage award in favor of Charles Lewis, compensating him for injuries caused by a procedural due process violation by his prison officers.

Lewis, an Alabama prisoner, filed this pro se section 1983 action against prison officials Mark Smith, Freddie Smith, and Arnold Holt. He alleged that they violated his procedural due process rights in connection with a prison disciplinary hearing for the possession of contraband. The decision that Lewis was guilty of possessing contraband was made by defendant Mark Smith, Chairman of the Prison Disciplinary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by307 opinions

  1. Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Mann v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Holloman Ex Rel. Holloman v. HarlandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Columbus Brown, A/K/A Lenwood Johnson v. Fred Crawford, Director of Dade County JailCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Leon F. Harrigan v. Ernesto RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API