Legal Opinion

Major Harden v. George E. Pataki

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 10, 2003No. 01-15186PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372-73, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), the Supreme Court “held that a state prisoner’s claim for damages is not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if ‘a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence,’ unless the prisoner can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has previously been invalidated.” Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 643, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 1586, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). This case presents the question whether a claim for damages and declaratory relief…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Jessie Harrison v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Cohen v. LongshoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Weilburg v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Ben E. Jones v. State of Florida Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API