Legal Opinion

Eagerton v. Klingler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1983No. 81-802, 81-803PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

These cross petitions for certiorari concern the scope of the Department of Revenue’s authority under Code of 1975, § 40-2-11(8), to seek information from individuals regarding their potential sales tax liability. We reverse on the Department of Revenue’s petition, concluding that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in requiring the Department of Revenue to first prove that respondent Klingler is engaged in a business for which he must collect and remit a sales tax before seeking records relevant to determining that very matter. On Klingler’s cross petition raising constitutional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert M. McCoy and Charles SussmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. State, Department of Revenue v. OliverAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klingler v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Siegel v. New Jersey Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Eagerton v. KlinglerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In Re SiegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API