Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert M. McCoy and Charles Sussman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1979No. 79-1671PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Robert M. McCoy, who had been engaged in business as a customshouse broker, and Charles Sussman, an accountant employed by McCoy’s lawyer to analyze some of McCoy’s records, appeal from judgments that they were each guilty of contempt for refusing to comply with grand jury subpoenas duces tecum requiring, in sweeping terms, the production of numerous documents and records relating to McCoy’s business and analyses of them prepared by Sussman. Considering the objections raised by McCoy, we conclude that some of the documents requested were records of a business…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Reginald R. Brinkmann, Jr. v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff AbnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. LangwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Kleiner v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.