Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1992No. 66A04-9105-CR-151PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Defendant-Appellant William E. Smith appeals his conviction for Failure to Permit Examination of Records, a class D felony. IND. CODE 6-3-6-11; ICG 85-50-2-7.
We affirm.
Smith raises the following issues for our review:
1. whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that Smith had a constitutional right to refuse to turn over incriminating records,
2. whether there was sufficient evidence to establish the existence of records, and
3. whether the trial court erred in allowing the State's witness to refer to Smith's failure to file tax returns.
In 1989, John…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. John Doe, M.D. And Steve Roe, Witnesses-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Johnston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. StrogerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- William Smith v. John Richert, Judge, Pulaski Circuit Court Pamela Carter, Attorney General, State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994