Legal Opinion
United States v. Lozano
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 25, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01487Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 18-cv-1487-AJB-NLS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNITED 13 STATES’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND 14 PERMANENT INJUNCTION CYNTHIA LOZANO, dba CLozano 15 Income Tax, 16 Defendant. (Doc. No. 9) 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is the United States’ motion for default judgment and 20 permanent injunction against Cynthia Lozano. (Doc. No. 9.) For the reasons stated below, 21 the motion is GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of the United States and 22…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. CrawfordDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.