Legal Opinion
Vaudable v. Montmartre, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1959PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.
Plaintiffs, owner and operator of the famous Maxim’s restaurant in Paris, move for summary judgment in this action for a permanent injunction restraining defendants, owner and operator of a newly opened restaurant in the Gramercy Park section of this city, from using the name Maxim’s. A motion for summary judgment may now be made in any action (Buies Civ. Prac., new rule 113, adopted eff. March 1,1959) and should be granted where there are no triable issues of fact and the claim is sufficiently established to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment.
The French restaurant, “…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- The Standard Oil Company, a Corporation and Sohio Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Standard Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tommaso Buti Fashion World Company, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- National Lampoon, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.