Commonwealth v. Schwartz

BY JUDGE THOMAS D. HORNE

The Court has previously taken under advisement the request for a bill of particulars with respect to the charge of conspiracy. It is the contention of the defendant that she is entitled to a further particularization of the person or persons generally identified in Count II of the indictment by the use of the phrase “et al.” In addition, she seeks to have the Commonwealth particularize the date of the agreement and the place where the agreement was formed.

Both the Commonwealth and the defendant recognize the office of a proper bill of particulars, not as a discovery…