Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
At issue in these cases is whether the public and the press have a constitutional right to attend pretrial proceedings in criminal cases, and, if so, how that right should be balanced against an accused’s constitutional right to a fair trial. This conflict between fair trial and free press is “almost as old as the Republic.” Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, All U.S. 539, 547 (1976).
I
These consolidated cases (three appeals and two original petitions) arise out of three criminal prosecutions. 1
The following facts are undisputed.
A
The Hoard Case
A Northumberland County grand jury indicted Ernst…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Seattle Times Co. v. IshikawaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.