Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Huff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1894No. 1103PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wilbarger.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try title, in which the appellant was plaintiff in the court below, and the following named persons were defendants: S. P. Huff, administrator of the estate of W. R. Morrison, deceased; W. R. Morrison, Sr., Mary L. Foster, A. L. Foster, Jane E. Hoffman and her husband, J. E. Hoffman; James K. Morrison, H. E. Morrison, heirs of W. R. Morrison, deceased; M. A. Byers, widow of C. M. Byers, now the wife of E. Powers, her codefendant, Mrs. Powers being sued in her individual capacity and also as the administratrix of the estate of C. M.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballard v. CarmichaelTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Laughter v. SeelaTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Collins v. BallowTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Jenkins v. Adams & WicksTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Schmidt v. TalbertTexas Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Gregg v. First. Nat. Bank In BrownsvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Jordan v. Grandfield Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Carroll v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Teat v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API